Top leaders must act responsibly on religious issues, says SC Bench

New Delhi: The Supreme Court, during a hearing on the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Laddu dispute, made a strong appeal for restraint from individuals in prominent positions, emphasizing the importance of maintaining sensitivity towards religious issues that resonate with millions. The bench, comprising Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, addressed the public interest litigations filed in connection with the case, as explained by High Court Advocate Kakarla Chandrasekhar.

Hearing on Tirumala laddu dispute

According to Advocate Kakarla Chandrasekhar, the case, which revolves around the sacred laddu prasadam of the Tirumala temple, saw arguments filed by senior BJP leader Dr. Subramanya Swamy, YSRCP leader YV Subbareddy, and various representatives. Chandrasekhar confirmed that Senior Supreme Court Counsel Tushar Mehta represented the Centre, Senior Advocate Siddhartha Luthra appeared for Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), and Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi represented the Andhra Pradesh government. Separate petitions were also filed by Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Hindu Sena, as noted by Chandrasekhar.

Importance of sensitivity in religious issues

Kakarla Chandrasekhar highlighted the Supreme Court’s concern about the delicate balance between religion and politics in India, a nation of 140 crores. Given the cultural and spiritual significance of the Tirumala temple, Chandrasekhar relayed the court’s emphasis on respecting the religious sentiments of millions. He pointed out that the court advised against mixing religious matters with political issues, particularly in public statements, to avoid controversy.

Court’s cautionary remarks

As per Advocate Chandrasekhar, the two-judge bench made strong remarks, urging that public figures should exercise caution and seek a second opinion when making statements to the media on sensitive religious issues. The bench stressed the need for those in high positions to maintain a clear distinction between politics and faith, thereby ensuring that religious sentiments are not disturbed.

Case adjournment

Kakarla Chandrasekhar clarified that the Supreme Court’s remarks were made as part of the ongoing hearing and do not represent a final judgment. The case has been adjourned to 3:30 pm on Thursday for further proceedings.